Is Africa’s skyscraper mini-boom a cause for alarm?

by Amy Frearson |

Africa is experiencing a mini-boom in skyscraper construction, with new towers rising in Egypt, Ethiopia, Ivory Coast and more. But are they symbols of progress or just vanity projects? Dezeen editor-at-large Amy Frearson investigates.

The Tour F in Abidjan, Ivory Coast, will soon become the continent’s tallest building, expected to reach its full 421-metre height later this year.

It will steal the title from the 394-metre Iconic Tower in Cairo, Egypt, which became Africa’s first completed supertall – a title given to buildings over 300 metres – when it opened in 2024.

High-rise building gathering pace

The situation is in stark contrast to a decade ago, when the Carlton Centre in Johannesburg, South Africa, was still the only African building to surpass the 200-metre mark.

This 201-metre tower was the continent’s tallest for 46 years, but it looks like it will be pushed out of the top 10 in the coming months.

A spate of recent completions includes the 250-metre Mohammed VI Tower in Salé, Morocco, finished in 2023, and the 209-metre Commercial Bank of Ethiopia Headquarters in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, built in 2021. Many more are scheduled for this year.

The rate of development still pales in comparison to North America and Asia, but it appears to be gaining pace, which has triggered concerns.

Tour F under construction in Abidjan
The 421-metre Tour F in Abidjan, Ivory Coast, is set to become Africa’s tallest building. It is due to complete this year. Photo by Zaizone via Wikimedia Commons

Somalia-based architect Omar Degan, co-founder and curator of the inaugural Pan-African Biennale of Architecture, worries that most of these skyscrapers are being built with little regard for local building traditions and lifestyle habits.

“The rapid rise of skyscraper construction across African cities raises critical questions around identity, power, climate and urban futures, particularly as many cities navigate growth through imported models rather than locally rooted architectural logics,” he told Dezeen.

“I think it’s essential to unpack both the opportunities and the risks this brings,” he said. “And to ask whether verticality can meaningfully respond to African contexts rather than simply replicate global templates.”

Degan is not opposed to skyscrapers in African cities per se, but he wants to see models that reflect African cultural identity.

“I think there have been missed opportunities to see skyscrapers as a way of identifying a nation,” he said. “I would love to see a Moroccan skyscraper or a Nigerian skyscraper.”

But what’s fuelling this mini-boom, and can we expect it to continue?

According to Jason M Barr, professor of economics at Rutgers University-Newark, the data points to a link between African skyscraper construction and economic growth.

“Iconic buildings can benefit African cities, but the economics must work”

Statistics from the Council on Vertical Urbanism reveal that South Africa and Egypt, Africa’s two largest economies, account for around 75 per cent of all buildings of more than 30 storeys in the continent.

Egypt also has more of the tallest buildings under construction than the rest of Africa combined, in both Cairo and the nation’s new capital.

“Countries generally don’t build tall buildings unless all the ‘economics ducks’ are in a row, as they are expensive to build and operate,” explained Barr, author of the book Cities in the Sky: The Quest to Build the World’s Tallest Skyscrapers.

“If you look at the breakdown of usages for all 30-plus-storey buildings in Africa, most are offices, residential or mixed-use buildings, which are compatible with the economic need for tall buildings,” he told Dezeen.

Iconic Tower in Cairo
The 394-metre Iconic Tower in Cairo, Egypt, became Africa’s first supertall when it completed in 2024. Photo by Mohamed Ouda via Wikimedia Commons

Barr argues that African cities can benefit from the power of tall buildings as “confidence boosters”. He said that few appear to be “white elephants” – built as status symbols rather than to meet a real need or demand.

“Iconic buildings can benefit African cities, but the underlying economics of these buildings must work – that is to say, the revenues paid by the occupants must cover the construction and operating costs,” he said.

“Given the history of economic and political troubles in Africa, we tend to associate Africa’s rising towers as emerging from that milieu,” he added. “But rather, its rising towers appear to reflect these countries’ desire to join the global community.”

Nigerian architect Tosin Oshinowo is more sceptical. She sees a clear divide between skyscrapers rising in Egypt and those going up in other African cities.

“A skyscraper is ultimately a symbol of progress,” she said. “I see countries in Africa beginning to think in that capacity, not because the economies are strong enough to achieve it, but because they want to present the narrative.”

“Is this what Africa needs? I don’t think so”

As Oshinowo points out, Africa accounts for just under three per cent of global GDP and doesn’t have the same issues of land availability as other territories, such as Europe or the Middle East.

It leads her to question whether developments like Eko Atlantic City, a huge new high-rise district being built in her home city of Lagos, are appropriate. She believes density could be achieved in buildings that are more African in their scale and approach.

“The world has a narrative of what we consider progress, and anything that deviates from that is just not seen as progressive,” she said.

“But there are many ways that we can solve these problems, so it doesn’t merit the justification of this symbol. And is this symbol what the continent needs? I don’t think so.”

Oshinowo cites Africa’s shortage of steel manufacturing as one reason why skyscrapers make less sense here.

It’s expensive to import, so local contractors don’t have the necessary construction expertise. Many of the skyscrapers now under construction are being built by Chinese companies.

Electricity is another problem; unlike North Africa, cities in West and Sub-Saharan Africa regularly experience power outages.

“The tall building requires certain infrastructure and amenities that we don’t have as standard,” Oshinowo said.

“When you bring in a typology that requires them, it’s a very different ballgame. What happens if you’re in the lift and the power goes out?”

But Belgian architect and construction consultant Hans Degraeuwe, who has been working in Africa for over 15 years and lives part-time in Lagos, argues that high-rise building may be a necessity as cities develop further.

Addis Ababa
The 209-metre Commercial Bank of Ethiopia Headquarters became the tallest building in Addis Ababa in 2021, but will soon be overtaken by the 327-metre Ethiopian Electric Power Headquarters. Photo by Fanuel Leul via Unsplash

“Unlike the urban sprawl that happened in America, Africa has to go vertical because it cannot simply afford to make the road infrastructure, power infrastructure or data infrastructure,” he told Dezeen.

Backed by a sovereign wealth fund, Degraeuwe is currently developing a model for customisable, modular high-rises, with plans to roll out different versions on 24 test sites across Africa pre-fabricated in Lagos.

He believes that prefabrication technologies could offer an answer to issues around not just skyscraper construction expertise but utility shortages – with the buildings themselves providing basic infrastructure for entire neighbourhoods.

“The skyscrapers we want are not just five-star hotels,” he said. “We want to have a hotel combined with a hostel, a medical clinic and a water-purification station.”

“I’m trying to create vertical communities that mix different functions, including affordable housing.”

Whether this low-rise continent manages to adapt models of vertical urbanism to fit its needs remains to be seen. Either way, the high-rise trend isn’t showing signs of slowing just yet.

The main photograph is by Youssef Abdelwahab via Unsplash.

Tech firm buys 10-acre Downtown Atlanta site for potential $3.8B project

By Henry Queen – Staff Reporter, Atlanta Business Chronicle

Ten acres in the heart of Downtown Atlanta have sold to a company that envisions an eye-catching project on property that is no stranger to ambitious proposals.

Webstar Technology Group on Wednesday said it closed on the site at the corner of Ted Turner Drive SW and Whitehall Street SW in the Castleberry Hill area. The price was not disclosed, and a deed for the sale has not yet been recorded. Previous financial disclosures said the sale was valued at $33 million.

David Branch and Peyton Stinson with SSG Realty Partners represented the seller, McCall Railroad LLC. Jae Kim with CBRE represented the buyer, a subsidiary of Webstar called Forge Atlanta Asset Management. The firm has said it will sell cryptocurrency tokens to help finance the project. That would not “replace traditional financing, but rather adds a new, carefully structured opportunity,” per the company.

“Closing on the land for Forge Atlanta marks a major milestone in our vision to transform an under‑utilized industrial block into a vibrant, mixed‑use district,” Webstar Technology Group CEO Ricardo Haynes said in a statement. “By integrating traditional real estate financing with compliant blockchain technology, we are opening the door for residents, investors and communities to participate in Atlanta’s growth.”

In 2021, Urbantec Development Partners proposed a life science research hub for the site — a plan that fizzled two years later. Kim, a vice president at CBRE, led that company and still has a small stake in the new Forge Atlanta project.

Webstar, a public company, is valued at roughly a penny on OTC Markets, though it has inched up in recent days. As of Sept. 30, Webstar had $7,789 in cash and a little over $600,000 in total assets — most of which were related to this real estate project, according to a recent U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission filing.

Phase 1 of Forge Atlanta, as this project has been dubbed, would include a 300‑key hotel, approximately 600 residential condominiums, and about 60,500 square feet of retail and entertainment space, according to a news release. About 1,600 parking spaces are also planned. The condos are expected to be priced from $750,000 to $2.4 million.

SSG listing
The 10-acre Downtown Atlanta site that sold on Dec. 17 is highlighted in yellow.

A September feasibility study from CBRE and Turner and Townsend said the overall plan is to build 950 hotel rooms, over 2,300 condo units, two 300,000-square-foot office buildings, two 100,000-square-foot data centers, two 40,000-square-foot conference centers, a 50,000-square-foot entertainment center and more.

Across all phases, there may be more than 8.5 million square feet of development, carrying a cost of $3.77 billion, according to the feasibility study. Ernst & Young and Develop Fulton projected the full project would create 3,000 jobs (construction and permanent) and generate an economic impact of over $7 billion, Webstar said.

It’s a staggering proposal that raises some questions. Bisnow reported in July that Webstar has left behind a trail of red flags, including nonexistent permits, collapsed land deals and unverifiable resumes.

Some elements of the project may be difficult to execute. In 2024, the city of Atlanta banned new data center development within a half-mile of MARTA stations, and the Forge property is within that distance from MARTA’s Garnett station. Condo development in Atlanta has been limited in the near two decades since the Great Recession. New office construction has plummeted since the pandemic.

Plus, Downtown Atlanta does not typically attract projects of this scale meant to make a profit. The ongoing $5 billion Centennial Yards development is supported by up to $1.9 billion in public financing, which was approved by Atlanta City Council in 2018.

Meanwhile, the nearby revitalization of historic buildings in South Downtown is made possible because of tech entrepreneur David Cummings’ investment, bolstered by proceeds from the growth and eventual sales of his former startups. The project does not need to hit a certain internal rate of return to pay investors or lenders.

“We’re not competing to get IRR returns to go sell the buildings,” SoDo Atlanta LLC CEO Jon Birdsong, Cummings’ business partner, recently told Cushman & Wakefield’s Tim Wright on the Sunbelt Developers podcast.

Develop Fulton did recently advance a public financing plan for the first phase of the Forge Atlanta project. The authority’s board of directors voted in October to approve a $223.7 million bond inducement resolution, resulting in approximately $9.7 million in tax savings over 10 years for Webstar.

A public commenter during the Develop Fulton meeting raised questions about the accuracy of Webstar’s presentation and criticized the company’s lack of public engagement.

In its Dec. 17 news release, Webstar committed to hosting community meetings, workforce development programs and cultural events starting in 2026.

According to the news release, other companies involved in the project include:

  • Turner & Townsend will provide development management. 
  • Skanska has participated in preliminary discussions and pre-construction planning as a potential general contractor, subject to the negotiation. 
  • Skyline Engineering will provide in‑house oversight and quality control. 
  • Kimley-Horn will serve as the lead engineer. 
  • Nelson Worldwide will lead design.

A ceremonial groundbreaking is projected for mid-2026, and construction of the first phase is expected to last up to three years.

Several options at play as DC leaders consider transit for new Commanders stadium

Homa Bash WASHINGTON

DC leaders discuss transit options for the Commanders’ new stadium.

D.C. council members and transportation leaders met for hours on Wednesday to figure out the best way to get people in and out of the new Commanders stadium.

Planning starts:

We’re just about 14 months away from the start of construction, but the conversation about transportation is well underway. 

Leaders repeatedly made it clear that this transportation plan isn’t just for Commanders’ fans on eight or nine Sundays — it’s for the people who live in these neighborhoods surrounding the stadium 365 days a year.

AI Conceptual Illustration

“Even folks who were opposed to the stadium early on, they know it’s coming, so they want it to be successful,” D.C. Councilmember and Chair of the Transportation Committee Charles Allen said. 

He says success means a smooth ride for fans and everyday residents. 

“It’s not having tens of thousands of people driving cars here. It’s thinking about transportation. Get people on Metro,” Allen said. 

“I can imagine there’s going to be a lot of cars and people trying to park, so being able to alleviate that is going to be a benefit to the community,” resident Olo Olakanmi told FOX 5. 

Big picture view:

The D.C. Council hearing saw representatives from the D.C. Department of Transportation, WMATA, and the Commanders, as well as ANC commissioners in neighboring communities.

Allen emphasized that this is more than just a stadium — they’re also planning 6,000 to 8,000 new homes, 20,000 people living in a brand-new neighborhood.

AI Conceptual Illustration

As of now, there are two parking garages planned for the Commanders Stadium, expected to hold about 6,000 vehicles. But when it comes to transit, there are several possibilities at play.

Dig deeper:

Metro would need major upgrades to use the Stadium Armory stop — likely including adding an entrance, elevator, and expanding the mezzanine.

A new Metro stop could end up costing hundreds of millions of dollars and take years to build.

WMATA is getting $2 million from the District for planning. General Manager Randy Clarke said that the goal is to have 40% of game day traffic come from public transit.

But that could also include bus rapid transit lines moving people from Union Station to the stadium along the H Street corridor.

“I have confidence we’re all going to work together, and everyone has the same goal here — to make this the best possible urban sports facility and mixed-use development in the country,” Clarke said. 

The plan right now is to have shovels in the ground by March 2027 and construction complete by May 2030.

“We want to make this the most transit-friendly stadium but also make sure all modes of transportation are optimized for folks to get there,” DDOT Director Sharon Kershbaum said. 

So, a lot of these transit decisions need to be made fairly quickly.

Commanders Select Architect For New 65,000-Seat D.C. Stadium

The global architecture firm behind the Dallas Cowboys’ stadium has been tapped to design the new home of their fiercest rival.

The Washington Commanders selected HKS as the lead architect for the 65,000-seat stadium on the site of the former RFK Stadium, the team announced Thursday morning. The stadium is expected to start vertical construction in 2027 and open in 2030. 

An early conceptual rendering of the Washington Commanders’ planned 65,000-seat, domed stadium.

The selection is the first major milestone for the project since it received final approval from the D.C. Council in September. The city agreed to fund $1.1B for infrastructure improvements to support the stadium, while the team has pledged $2.7B for the construction of the stadium and surrounding development. 

The team had narrowed its search for an architect to two finalists that both previously designed NFL stadiums, HKS and HNTB, The Athletic reported in October.  

HKS designed SoFi Stadium, home of the Los Angeles Rams and Chargers, which opened in 2020, as well as the Minnesota Vikings’ U.S. Bank Stadium that opened in 2016 and the Cowboys’ AT&T Stadium that opened in 2009. 

“HKS has a proven track record of delivering world-class stadiums that balance design, functionality and community impact,” Commanders President Mark Clouse said in a statement, adding that the partnership’s vision is “to create a stadium that enhances the fan experience, strengthens our connection with the community, and sets a new standard for the future of sports and entertainment.”

Conceptual renderings show a glass roof to bring in light. This would better position the city to host the Super Bowl and allow it to hold concerts and other events in the winter. The team estimates it will host more than 200 events per year.  

Before crafting its design, HKS said it plans to hold community meetings in coordination with District officials starting this month. HKS Global Venues Director Mark Williams said the design should celebrate “the pride and unmistakable energy of the nation’s capital.”

“We’re reimagining what home-field advantage means by channeling the rhythm and the roar that made RFK so special and carrying that spirit forward in a bold new way,” he said in a statement. “The site, set within the monumental fabric of Washington, D.C., is one of the most extraordinary in professional sports, and we are honored to help write the next chapter in its history.”

The RFK Stadium site is 2 miles due east of the Capitol, which itself is due east of the Washington Monument and Lincoln Memorial. The stadium where D.C.’s NFL franchise played from 1961 to 1996, before moving to Landover, Maryland, is now being demolished. 

The stadium site spans 174 acres, and plans call for a commercial development district around the sporting venue. It is envisioned for up to 6,000 housing units, with 30% of them income-restricted, plus hotels, restaurants and retail. The project would also preserve the Fields at RFK recreational facilities on the site. 

The land is owned by the federal government, and then-President Joe Biden transferred control to the District through a 99-year ground lease in early January. President Donald Trump threatened to derail the project, criticizing the team’s name change. This weekend, Trump attended the Commanders’ home game against the Lions, and ESPN reported he has expressed a desire to the team’s ownership to have the stadium named after him.