OMA completes New Museum “pair” expansion project in New York

by Ben Dreith

OMA completes “highly connected, but highly individual” expansion of New York’s New Museum

Architecture studio OMA has mirrored the programme of the SANAA-designed New Museum in Manhattan with an extension that has a unique profile and facade treatment.

Led by OMA‘s New York office, the New Museum expansion features a ground-up build abutting the structure Japanese architecture studio SANAA designed for the institution in 2007.

OMA’s project, its first public building in the city, doubles the footprint of the contemporary art museum to 120,000 square feet (11,000 square metres), adding much-needed social and gallery space and additional egress for the expanding number of visitors.

OMA New York principal Shohei Shigematsu said the conditions for the expansion were unusual, given the relative contemporaneity of the SANAA building and referenced the idea of a “twin or pair” in his studio’s design.

“We were very careful in actually understanding what it means to build contemporary against contemporary,” Shigematsu told Dezeen.

“We actually looked at the idea of the pairs, or that notion of the pair.”

New Museum extension
A massive staircase fills the atrium at the front of the building. Photo by Jason Keen

He recalled a set of reference images, such as that of a performance of Marina Abramovic and her then-husband Ulay standing naked facing each other in a doorway for in 1977 and of the fixed-service structures that support an orbital rocket pre-launch.

“I often joked, when I had to present this to the board members, that finding the love of your life is one of the most difficult things, right?” he said. “So this is what we were doing here.”

“It’s highly connected, but highly individual too,” he continued.

OMA museum project in New York City
The metal-mesh staircase was painted on the inside to produce a moire effect. Photo by Jason O’Rear.

Scrapping the initial notion of maintaining the facade of the pre-existing, mid-rise industrial building, OMA designed a building that resembles a pentagon in section. It has a steep recess at ground level and a deep setback above tapering towards a central point, where it “kisses” the facade of the SANAA building.

From the north, the structure is mostly obscured by the taller SANAA building, but it extends deeper into the block.

“It’s actually quite surprising, because from outside, it’s not so screaming for presence, but as you enter, you feel the depth,” said Shigematsu.

New Museum extension interior
Gaps in the facade near the top allow views out and up. Photo by Jason O’Rear.

The faceted facade was clad in laminated glass with metal mesh that recalls the aluminium mesh of the SANAA building, while remaining distinct.

Immediately inside the street-facing walls, an atrium between the galleries and the facade allowed for a winding staircase that connects at each landing to the levels of both buildings.

New Museum extension interior
It nearly doubles the gallery, programming and office space for the New Museum. Photo by Jason Keen

At the fourth level, there is a soaring columnless space with an auditorium that faces a glass-filled void in the facade, which has views out into the Bowery.

Shigematsu referred to the staircase atrium as a “social and visible condenser” that allows the whole museum complex to become more “open and communicative”.

New Museum extension interior
The office space at the top of the building was referred to as its “brain” by OMA. Photo by Jason Keen

Shigematsu said the vernacular front-facade fire escape played into the articulation of the stair.

Further voids in the facade hold balconies and additional panes of glass without the metal mesh form stripes running down the side of the building, giving the building a sense of publicness and transparency.

New Museum extension informed by pairs
Outdoor balconies feature along the building’s upper slope. photo by Jason O’Rear.

OMA’s building sits at the junction of a three-way intersection and faces Prince Street, acting as a terminus. The entry into the newly programmed entrance extends the street into the building and upwards, up the new staircase.

At ground level, the slope of the OMA facade was articulated again at the north side, folding inwards. This exposed more of the SANAA building, leading the team to bring in additional material to extend the original facade.

This double fold created a triangular exterior courtyard. Next to it, the primary entrance into the museum leads into a lobby that includes the unticketed ground floors of both structures.

A massive portal door leads from the original lobby into the ground floor of the extension, which centres around a concealed restaurant, clad in expanded cork painted with silver leaf, blending it into the metal ceilings and polycarbonate-clad elevator core.

New Museum extension informed by SANAA building
It sits deeper in the block but also lower than the neighbouring SANAA building. Photo by Jason O’Rear

The restaurant acts as an enclosed courtyard within the lobby, and the plan is for it to be accessible via the lobby as well as via Freeman Alley at the back of the structure after the museum has closed. Inside, it features walls and ceiling also clad in cork, this time left unpainted.

It has textured glass that obscures the interior of the restaurant from the lobby, but allows restaurant goers to look out.

In order to allow for free movement on the ground level, the ticketing was pushed to the stairwells at the front of the building.

New Museum extension by OMA
The extension terminates a street. Photo by Jason Keen

The winding stairway crisscrosses the atrium at severe angles and is clad with more mesh, painted green on the inside to create a moire effect. Exposed I-beams and highly polished meshed floors create a collage of industrial materials.

New galleries echo the relatively simple format of the original, with high ceilings and white walls.

The gallery spaces run for the first three storeys, while above level four, incubator spaces and offices form what the studio called the “brain” of the building, conceptually and formally.

New Museum extension
The faceted facade creates a triangular exterior courtyard. Photo by Jason Keen

New Museum artistic director Massimo Gioni referred to the prismatic quality of the new building, saying it reflects the non-collecting museum’s mission to “refract” artistic messages from all over the world.

For Shigematsu, the build represents a culmination of arts and culture work in New York for OMA and recalls the studio’s other recent museum, the faceted glass extension for Buffalo AKG Art Museum. He was also part of the failed bid for a Whitney Museum extension in 2001.

“It took 20 years, but gave me the kind of holistic understanding of the ecosystem of art,” he said.

“It’s a once-in-a-lifetime chance to be able to do a building of this calibre in Manhattan. So we are very blessed.”

OMA’s founder, Rem Koolhaas has long theorised about New York, with his 1979 book Delirious New York being a significant work of architectural theory.

Other recent museum projects by OMA include the aluminium-clad Gallery of the Kings at the Museo Egizio in Italy 

The photography is by Jason O’Rear and Jason Keen.


Futuristic Soldier Field concept urges Bears to stay in Chicago

by Ben Dreith

Local architecture studio Edward Peck Design has proposed adding a  translucent canopy to the Chicago Bears’ stadium to convince the NFL team to stay in the city.

Edward Peck Design designed the concept stadium to meet the desires of the team for a next-generation stadium, with a roof, expanded seating and an entertainment complex.

The studio created the concept to demonstrate how the team could redevelop its current site and stay in the city.

Following pushback from conservationists contributed to the Chicago Bears abandoning plans to build a Manica Architecture-designed stadium slightly south of the current one, the team has seriously considered sites in the neighbouring state of Indiana.

“The Bears should stay”

“We’re not looking to be the architect of the next Bears stadium, but everyone that you talk to in Chicago says the Bears should stay,” studio founder Edward Peck told Dezeen. “They need to stay. This is the heart of Chicago.”

“They’re saying that’s not possible at Soldier Field,” said Peck. “I have an anonymous client who is a lifetime Bears fan who said, ‘I don’t believe them.'”

Chicago Bears concept stadium rendering
Edward Peck Design has designed a concept to urge the Chicago Bears to stay in the city

Peck, who is an expert in ETFE installation and has worked for architecture and engineering studios such as Helmut Jahn and Thornton Tomasetti, set out to show the feasibility of expanding the current Soldier Field complex.

This includes suspending a massive ETFE canopy over the field to enclose it, building on top of the modern 2002 addition to the 1920s stadium.

Around the complex, Peck and his team proposed a deck that would elevate an entertainment complex over the adjacent railyards and Lake Shore Drive.

Decking over Lake Shore Drive

The deck aligns with a plan put forward by developer Bob Dunn, and echoes the Chicago Park District’s suggestion of capping the lake-side highway elsewhere along the park complex that lines Chicago’s riverfront.

“The concept of decking over Lake Shore Drive and the rail station has been done,” said Peck. “Millennium Park is a result of that.”

“And so it’s part of the language of Chicago now, and the future is to start to consider things like that,” he continued.

On top of the decking would be a series of 50 to 65-storey skyscrapers with entertainment programmes on the lower floors. According to Peck, the skyscrapers would generate revenue for the city, while the ground floors could generate the team’s desired revenue.

The district would also serve the adjacent museum district and convention centre, as well as the mass of residential buildings and office structures in the southern part of Downtown Chicago.

“You have this entertainment district that needs to succeed the other 357 days of the year that there isn’t a football game, right? And so to do that, you have to have a critical mass of people,” said Peck.

“Now they are considering the stadium in Aurora, which is like 30 miles north of the city, and in Indiana, which is like 30 miles southeast of the city – those locations are not going to be able to support it.”

“I’m fearful of what this would do to this city”

Peck’s team has pointed to both the Shed complex in Hudson Yards in New York and Miami’s stadium renovation as precedents for this type of project.

Surrounding the stadium itself would be a plaza as well as additional restaurants and amenities, all covered by a “green carpet” that would reduce the amount of exposed concrete and blend the expanded complex into the park.

Peck also imagines a high-speed water taxi mooring to service the stadium.

He conceded that the deck and skyscraper portion could exceed a billion dollars in investment, but that the reuse of the stadium could allow for that portion to be built with as much as a 60 per cent reduction from a ground-up build.

“The goal is to open this dialogue and have the Bears be challenged a little bit,” said Peck on his ambition for the proposal.

“This was a proof of concept. None of this stuff hasn’t been done before. It’s, think, a creative way of looking at how you can accomplish the Bear’s mission.”

Chicago Bears concept rendering
The concept includes decking to support skyscrapers over Lake Shore Dr

On top of that, Peck said that moving the Chicago Bears from Soldier Field would throw into question the financial future of the historic stadium.

“The fact is, if you have an enclosed stadium a quarter mile away, or even if it’s in northwest Indiana, it’s going to be taking the winter concerts, take away that revenue,” he said.

“I’m fearful of what this would do to this city.”

Multiple Indiana municipalities have already put in bids for the stadium, and Bear’s ownership and NFL officials are expected to make decisions about the team’s future soon.

Other recent moves in the NFL include the Oakland Raiders moving to a purpose-built stadium in Las Vegas.

The images and video are by Edward Peck Design.

Exploring the idea of the Bears moving

Exploring the idea of moving the Chicago Bears stadium to a location outside of Chicago opens up various alternatives that could benefit both the team and the surrounding communities. Here are several considerations for such a move:

1. Suburban Development

Moving to a suburban area could attract a larger fan base from the surrounding suburbs, where many Bears fans currently reside. Suburbs like Arlington Heights or Naperville may offer more space for a stadium and parking.

2. Cost-Effective Solutions

Constructing a new stadium in a less urban area could potentially lower costs related to land acquisition and construction. This could allow for more funding to be directed toward fan amenities and experiences.

3. Better Traffic Management

A stadium located outside the city might ease traffic congestion during game days, providing more accessible entrances and exits and potentially improving the overall experience for attendees.

4. Enhanced Stadium Features

A new location could allow for the design and construction of a state-of-the-art facility, incorporating modern technology and sustainability features that could enhance the fan experience and reduce environmental impact.

5. Community and Economic Benefits

The presence of the Bears in a new location could spur local economic development, creating jobs and revitalizing areas through increased tourism and event-related activities.

Conclusion

Moving the Chicago Bears stadium outside of Chicago presents unique opportunities to strengthen community ties, improve game-day experiences, and foster economic growth. Such a decision would necessitate careful planning and collaboration with local governments to ensure mutual benefits.

Shibanee & Kamal Architects design green-roofed housing community in Texas

by Sonia Singh

Architects Shibanee Sagar and Aadi Sagar explain how they introduced green-roofed suburban housing to foster daily contact with nature in this Texas community, as shown in this exclusive video by Dezeen.

Called Tapestry, the 121-home community in Frisco, Texas, was designed by Bangalore-based architecture firm Shibanee & Kamal Architects and was built by its construction and development arm Total Environment.

The 56-acre site integrates curved planted roofs, garden access for every room and a pedestrian-friendly masterplan surrounded by creeks, waterways and more than 600 mature native trees.

CEO Aadi Sagar, who leads Total Environment in the US, explained that the project is designed to connect residents with nature through its materiality and layout.

“We like to use natural materials as much as possible,” he said in the video interview, highlighting the use of wood, marble and long-lasting brick that “develops its own character over time.”

Tapestry custom home development frisco
The homes were designed by Shibanee & Kamal Architects

Every home features a curved green roof that contributes to both thermal comfort and protection from extreme weather.

Co-founder Shibanee Sagar noted that the green roof provides insulation for the home throughout the changing seasons.

“It helps keep the home cooler in the summer and even when there are hailstorms, it actually protects the roof,” she said.

master bedroom of Tapestry by Shibanee & Kamal Architects
Every room opens up to its own garden

Indoor-outdoor connection is a central principle across the development, supported by garden access from almost every space.

“Letting the outdoors in has been one of the guiding principles of the design that we do,” Shibanee said.

Shibanee described her design approach as rooted in fluidity, emphasising natural light and ventilation. The homes incorporate sawtooth windows angled to avoid harsh sunshine, which Aadi said were oriented to bring in softer, indirect daylight.

Tapestry green roof Frisco Texas by Shibanee & Kamal Architects
The homes feature curved green roofs

He noted that the arrival sequence was designed to introduce the project’s curving geometry, with the form opening out as residents move indoors, adding that the homes incorporate geometric forms such as circles and squares to maximise natural light.

Interior spaces continue the material palette with warm, natural finishes. Wood and marble are used throughout, while a mirrored kitchen backsplash reflects the planting outside to bring views of the landscape into the home.

Tapestry custom home community in Frisco Texas
The 121-home community is located in Frisco, Texas

For Shibanee, these decisions stem from the belief that design is shaped by relationships between people and their environment.

“The only thing that is really going to carry you is your relationships – whether it is with the natural world or with people,” she said.

Shibanee & Kamal Architects is a global architecture and design studio founded in Bangalore in 1996 by Shibanee and Kamal Sagar.

The firm is known for integrating outdoor spaces and natural materials throughout its projects.

The photography is by Total Environment.

nordic office of architecture delivers phase one of oslo’s new government quarter

nordic office of architecture delivers phase one of oslo's new government quarter

Nordic Office of Architecture with Haptic Architects, Scenario, and I-d. Interiørarkitektur & Design completes the first phase of Norway’s New Government Quarter in Oslo, on the site of the July 22nd, 2011, terrorist attacks, reopening the political center of the country as a reconfigured civic landscape. The masterplanconsolidates nearly all Norwegian ministries into a compact campus for around 4,100 employees. Framed as a ‘design for democracy,’ the project brings government functions together while restoring pedestrian routes, public plazas, and daily urban life to an area long defined by trauma and security barriers.

The masterplan arranges five new and two restored buildings as a ring of ministries around interconnected public spaces, stitching the quarter back into Oslo’s historic center. Phase 1 includes the restored Høyblokken alongside the new A- and D-blocks, forming what the architects describe as a public ‘front line’ facing the city. The retained G-block and future phases complete a walkable campus that balances visibility and discretion. ‘The New Government Quarter is now part of Oslo’s everyday life rather than an isolated enclave,’ says Knut Hovland, Partner and Head of Design at Nordic Office of Architecture.

nordic office of architecture delivers phase one of oslo's new government quarter - 1all images by Hufton + Crow

New Government Quarter phase one opens to the public

Previously, the former Y-block and surrounding road infrastructure had created a car-centric enclave. In its place, the Norway-, Denmark- and Iceland-based architectslink Hammersborg, the city center, and the fjord through reopened streets, refreshed plazas at Johan Nygaardsvolds plass and Einar Gerhardsens plass, and new pedestrian and cycling connections. A future public park, Regjeringsparken, designed with SLA and Bjørbekk & Lindheim, will introduce open lawns, native planting, and clear sightlines that maintain both accessibility and security.

At the center of Phase 1 stands the A-block and its 51-meter-high Pyramid Hall, a timber-lined atrium that functions as both lobby and symbolic heart. The space is animated by Outi Pieski’s AAhkA (Mother Earth), a vertically rising artwork that addresses Sámi history and indigenous futurism. Generous glazing, visible circulation, and open ground floors position the building as a permeable threshold between state and citizen. ‘From day one, the question was how to create a place that symbolizes Norwegian democracy and identity. We were asked to design a secure government district, but also a place where people feel welcome to walk, sit, protest and remember – a government quarter that belongs to the whole of Norway,’ reflects Gudmund Stokke, founding partner and head of design at Nordic Office of Architecture.

Bridges and shared social zones form what the team calls the Collaboration District, connecting ministries at the first-floor level and encouraging cross-departmental exchange. Internally, modular floor plates and flexible office layouts are designed to adapt to evolving political structures and digital work practices over decades.

nordic office of architecture delivers phase one of oslo's new government quarter - 2the first phase of Norway’s New Government Quarter in Oslo is completed

embedding security in landscape and long-term sustainability

The architecture responds directly to the post-2011 dilemma of reconciling security with public trust. Protective measures are integrated into landscape design, building envelopes, and controlled vehicle access. Clear sightlines, active ground levels, cafés, and accessible gardens invite everyday use.

Material choices root the complex in Norwegian geology and craft traditions. Larvikite stone clads facades and public surfaces, selected for durability and long-term patina. Locally sourced timber from Nordmarka brings warmth to interiors, while boatbuilders Risør Båtbyggeri, in collaboration with Biko, contributed to the double-curved wooden surfaces and sculpted stair elements. The buildings are designed to meet BREEAM-NOR Excellent standards, incorporating seawater-based heating and cooling, low-carbon concrete, and detailed envelopes to reduce operational energy demand. Approximately 20 percent of the 15,800 furniture items in Phase 1 are reused from previous government buildings, aligning circularity with continuity.

nordic office of architecture delivers phase one of oslo's new government quarter - 3reopening the political center of the country as a reconfigured civic landscape

art as memory and continuity

Curated and produced by KORO, the quarter hosts Norway’s largest public art program, comprising around 300 new and re-sited works. Artworks bearing visible traces of the 2011 attack have been conserved and relocated, forming a distributed memorial embedded in daily use.

The collection includes Pablo Picasso’s sandblasted concrete mural. The Fishermen, relocated from the former Y-block to the southwest facade of the A-block; Do Ho Suh’s Grass Roots Square, a field of approximately 50,000 small bronze figures supporting stone slabs at Einar Gerhardsen’s plass; and Jumana Manna’s 800-square-meter mosaic Sebastia at Johan Nygaardsvolds plass, composed of stone offcuts donated by municipalities across Norway, turning the plaza into a literal ‘city floor.’ The project also incorporates the public 22 July Centre, dedicated to the events of July 22nd, 2011, and anticipates the unveiling of the new National 22 July Memorial in summer 2026, marking 15 years since the attacks.

nordic office of architecture delivers phase one of oslo's new government quarter - 4the masterplan consolidates nearly all Norwegian ministries into a compact campus for around 4,100 employees

a national commission

Commissioned by the Ministry of Digitalisation and Public Administration with Statsbygg as developer, the project was awarded in 2017 to the Team Urbis consortium led by Nordic Office of Architecture. Phase 1 was delivered on time and within the parliamentary budget frame of NOK 24.7 billion and is expected to be completed for more than NOK 2 billion under this ceiling.

‘The New Government Quarter is a once-in-a-generation commission that demonstrates how architecture, landscape, engineering and art can come together on one of the most sensitive sites in Norway,’ says Eskild Andersen, CEO and Partner at Nordic Office of Architecture. ‘It transforms a closed government district into an open civic heart for Oslo and the country, where everyday government and everyday life converge.’ With Phase 2 set to begin in 2026 and complete by 2030, the quarter remains a long-term national project. 

nordic office of architecture delivers phase one of oslo's new government quarter - 5framed as a ‘design for democracy’

nordic office of architecture delivers phase one of oslo's new government quarter - 6the project brings government functions together

nordic office of architecture delivers phase one of oslo's new government quarter - 7the space is animated by Outi Pieski’s AAhkA (Mother Earth)

nordic office of architecture delivers phase one of oslo's new government quarter - 8Phase 1 includes the restored Høyblokken alongside the new A- and D-blocks

nordic office of architecture delivers phase one of oslo's new government quarter - 9a public ‘front line’ facing the city

nordic office of architecture delivers phase one of oslo's new government quarter - 10the masterplan arranges five new and two restored buildings as a ring of ministries

nordic office of architecture delivers phase one of oslo's new government quarter - 11the architecture responds directly to the post-2011 dilemma of reconciling security with public trust

nordic office of architecture delivers phase one of oslo's new government quarter - 12clear sightlines, active ground levels, cafés, and accessible gardens invite everyday use

1/5

historic terrazzo column and vertical timber paneling highlight material continuity across old and new

historic terrazzo column and vertical timber paneling highlight material continuity across old and new

a sculpted timber staircase spirals through the atrium

a sculpted timber staircase spirals through the atrium

a large-scale mural animates the collaboration district

a large-scale mural animates the collaboration district

the prime minister’s meeting room combines stone, timber ceilings, and curated norwegian design pieces

the prime minister’s meeting room combines stone, timber ceilings, and curated norwegian design pieces

timber-lined informal meeting area in høyblokken

timber-lined informal meeting area in høyblokken

Washington Commanders share new stadium renderings by HKS

Daniel Jonas Roche |

The new renderings give a sense of what the fan experience will look like on the ground.

Visuals reveal the stadium’s perimeter shrouded in vegetation and a new spherocylindrical, capsule-shaped grass lawn for tailgating, concerts, etc. The lawn feeds into a plaza that fronts the main entry.

aerial view of Washington Commanders stadium
New renderings show the perimeter shrouded in vegetation. (Courtesy Washington Commanders)

Updated renderings also show how the stadium will appear from three major access points: East Capitol Street Northeast, the Whitney Young Memorial Bridge, and East Capitol Street Southeast.

The stadium’s concave profile will maintain sight lines from East Capitol Street Southeast of the Capital Building and Washington Monument, according to the renderings.

Architecturally speaking, the new renderings also show subtle changes in the columns.

lawn in front of washington commanders stadium
A large grass lawn will host tailgates and concerts. (Courtesy Washington Commanders)
road and view of stadium
View from East Capitol Street Southeast shows the roof of the U.S. Capitol Building and Washington Monument towering up over the roof of the stadium.  (Courtesy Washington Commanders)

The last batch of renderings by HKS was issued in January; the tranche showed the stadium’s form and how it will axially respond to the U.S. Capitol Building and the Washington Monument, in alignment with the L’Enfant Plan.

Conceptual drawings by HKS were subsequently submitted to the National Capital Planning Commission (NCPC) for consideration on February 5. NCPC chairman Will Scharf called the design by HKS “a really incredible stadium,” while others said there was room for improvement.

Paul Ingrassia, General Services Administration acting general counsel, noted he appreciated “the references to classical architecture,” by HKS but said the columns could be redesigned to “convey a sense of heft and gravity for when people enter.”

As per Ingrassia’s direction, this latest cache shows the profile intact, albeit with perhaps more Greco-Roman influence in the columns, which seem to be different in plan.

A tall, vertical void is located at the outset of the columns, per the new renderings, creating a sense of depth and shadows.

road and view of washington commanders stadium
View from Whitney Young Memorial Bridge (Courtesy Washington Commanders)

The roofed stadium will ultimately be able to host 70,000 people and serve as an anchor of a mixed-use development. HKS noted 30 percent of the 180-acre site will be open space.

Vertical construction is anticipated to begin in spring 2027, and full completion is scheduled for 2030.

The Washington Commanders noted the design process is ongoing; the franchise is still seeking input from stakeholders, city officials, and community members.

The jury is still out on whether or not the stadium will be named after President Trump.

Obama Presidential Center opens this Juneteenth

by Daniel Jonas Roche |

The Obama Foundation announced the Obama Presidential Center campus will open to the public this upcoming Juneteenth weekend.

On June 19, the public will, at long-last, gain access to the 19-acre campus’s playground, museum building, public art installations, landscaped park space, and new Chicago Public Library branch.

The highly-anticipated opening will be a full-weekend affair with events running on June 18 through June 21, including a series of ribbon cuttings, talks, and activations.

A dedication ceremony on the John Lewis Plaza will commence June 18. The Obama Presidential Center will open its doors to the public the next day, June 19. On June 20 and June 21, community celebrations throughout the campus will take place.

President Barack Obama shared in a statement the center’s opening date is a timely one: “It is easy to look around right now and feel like the challenges we face are simply too big. But hope is not about ignoring the hard stuff. It is that thing inside us that insists something better awaits if we are willing to work for it.”

“Here on the South Side of Chicago, hope is getting a permanent home,” President Obama continued. “Starting on June 19, you can visit the Obama Presidential Center. This is not a monument to the past; it is a living destination for people who refuse to accept the status quo. If you feel that way, this is your invitation to join us.”

The Obama Presidential Center Museum was designed by Tod Williams Billie Tsien Architects (TWBTA). The project broke ground in late 2021, after drawn-out design and planning phases riddled with controversy, community pushback, and legal challenges.

Artists such as Theaster Gates and Julie Mehrutu have contributed works to the campus’s granite-clad tower by TWBTA that can be seen from afar.

Ahead of its completion, critics have already weighed in on the project. Last month, Chicago Sun-Times architecture critic Lee Bey pointed out the words—excerpted from a speech Obama gave in Selma, Alabama—lining the top of the building are difficult to discern.

The Program & Athletics Center designed by Moody Nolan, a facility dubbed Home Court, will also open to the public this upcoming June.

Valerie Jarrett, Obama Foundation CEO, noted, “The opening of the ObamaPresidential Center will be a beacon of hope to the world and a place where we hope guests will be inspired to bring change home to their communities.”

Sports district to be built around world’s largest stadium in India

by Amy Peacock

Architecture studios BDP, Cox Architecture and Collage Design have revealed designs for a trio of sports venues in Ahmedabad, India, which will be built alongside the world’s largest stadium.

Named Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel Sports Enclave, the complex will include a tennis venue, aquatics centre and indoor arena near the 132,000-seat Narendra Modi Stadium – a cricket ground that opened in 2020 and is the largest stadium in the world.

Situated along the Sabarmati River, the masterplan was designed by BDP, Cox Architecture and Collage Design as a city park and sports district ahead of Ahmedabad hosting the 2030 Commonwealth Games and the wider Gujarat state hosting the 2029 World Police and Fire Games.

Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel Sports Enclave
The Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel Sports Enclave will include an arena clad in jali screens

The new venues at the Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel Sports Enclave, which will be decorated with features that draw upon traditional Indian architecture, will be designed so that they can be used by local residents outside of major sports tournaments.

“Our vision for the Sports Enclave is to create an inclusive, sustainable and distinctly Indian destination for world sport,” said BDP India head Manisha Bhartia.

“By drawing on Ahmedabad’s architectural traditions and blending them with cutting-edge design and technology, we are designing beyond single-use, sporting venues that decay over time,” she continued. “We are shaping new, visually beautiful places that will host the world’s greatest sporting moments, but also remain an active, vibrant part of the city’s everyday life for decades to come.”

Tennis centre at the Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel Sports Enclave
A fabric roof will top a circular tennis court

A tennis centre will be built on the eastern side of the Narendra Modi Stadium. It will include a 10,000-seat centre court, two show courts with capacities of 5,000 and 3,000 seats, and additional outdoor courts.

The centre court will have a circular shape with a raised fabric roof designed for shading and natural ventilation.

At the eastern end of the Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel Sports Enclave will be an 18,000-seat indoor arena, which will host gymnastics and basketball events at the Commonwealth Games. After the games it will be used for concerts and other sports events.

The exterior will be clad in bronze anodised aluminium jali – a perforated screen with ornamental patterns found in traditional Indian architecture

At the western end of the masterplan, an aquatics centre will feature glazed walls with coloured glass louvres, designed to give a glowing appearance that evokes Diwali lanterns.

Topped with a swooping roof, the aquatics centre will host 12,000 spectators for swimming and diving events during major tournaments, and be reduced to a capacity of 4,000 when functioning as a community pool.

A National Institute of Sports Excellence will be located between the Narendra Modi Stadium and tennis centre, designed as a place for aspiring sports players with training halls, gymnasiums, recovery equipment and biomedical facilities.

Parks, restaurants and community sports courts will be added to the outdoor space along the riverfront.

Aquatics centre designed by BDP, Cox Architecture and Collage Design
The aquatics centre will be designed to have a glowing appearance reminiscent of Diwali lanterns

“The rich architectural response, building on Indian modernity and tradition, has created a truly unique design full of meaning and context that will make a lasting experience for global sporting events as well as a legacy that goes beyond such events,” said Cox Architecture director Alastair Richardson.

“This new public park and associated architecture will place Ahmedabad on the world stage for many years to come.”

The images are courtesy of BDP.

Zaha Hadid Architects designs curving cultural district on Hangzhou waterfront

by Starr Charles

A series of sweeping public buildings are set to make up the Qiantang Bay Cultural District designed by UK studio Zaha Hadid Architects along the Zhedong Canal in Hangzhou, China.

Designed by Zaha Hadid Architects, the development will contain cultural and educational buildings, including a library, youth centre and museum, framed by landscaped parklands, plazas and performance spaces.

A gallery, music hall and fitness centre will also be built as part of the development.

Qiantang Bay Cultural District render
Zaha Hadid Architects has designed a cultural district along the Zhedong Canal in Hangzhou

Renders of the proposal reveal a trio of sculptural waterside structures flanked with planted outdoor space and steps down to the canal.

A network of bridges and paths are set to weave through the site to connect both sides of the canal and the surrounding city with the new district.

“The Qiantang Bay Central Water Axis creates a series of new landscaped parklands, terraces and gardens along the Zhedong Canal – redefining the former industrial areas of the canal basin into a new green corridor and that weaves through the heart of the city,” the studio said.

Visualisation of cultural space by Zaha Hadid Architects
The district will include a library, youth centre and museum. Render by Atchain

Zaha Hadid Architects drew on Hangzhou’s terrain for the buildings’ sinuous designs. This includes a glazed library volume, which will be framed with large “inhabitable architectural columns” set to double as storage and reading spaces for visitors.

“Serving as structural support and defining the institutes identity as assembled ‘stones of knowledge’, these columns will accommodate the library’s extensive literary collections and archives,” the studio said.

Externally, the library’s facade will be fitted with folded glass elements to draw natural light into the interior, paired with masonry tiles informed by the region’s jade artistry.

Renders of the building also reveal a shiny underside to the overhanging roof, and curving wooden structures on the interior.

Exterior render of Qiantang Bay Cultural District
The library will have “inhabitable architectural columns”

Alongside this, the International Youth Centre will have a tiered, terrace-lined structure influenced by the adjacent waterfront.

According to the studio, the building’s facade geometries will extend to its “carved interior”, where auditoriums, studios and event spaces will cater to the city’s students.

Waterside youth centre at Qiantang Bay Cultural District
Terraces will wrap around the International Youth Centre

Throughout the development, flood-prevention strategies influenced by Hangzhou’s existing sponge-city infrastructure will be implemented.

Landscaping strategies will include permeable surfaces, planted swales and water-retention features for stormwater management.

Also in Hangzhou, Zaha Hadid Architects recently completed a curving footbridge that weaves around a trio of arches and Aedas completed a loop-shaped museum on an artificial island.

The renders are by Proloog unless otherwise stated.

Who is a woman who’s made an impact on your career?

by Edward Mitchell Estes

For me, the answer is my mother, Emellen Mitchell Estes. Long before I was designing urban spaces or serving as Mayor, she was the one who gave me the “zoning permits” to build imaginary cities in our backyard in Atlanta.

An educator at heart, Emellen was a graduate of two iconic HBCUs—Morris Brown College and Atlanta University, now known as Clark-Atlanta University. She served as a teacher and Principal in the Atlanta Public Schools during the segregated 50s, 60s, and 70s. Despite the challenges of the era, she and my father fostered my passion for art, architecture, and the performing arts.

A tribute to Emellen Mitchell Estes, a dedicated educator and mother, whose influence shaped a legacy in architecture and education.

She didn’t just teach me how to build; she taught me who I was. She shared our rich ancestral history and kept me grounded in faith at the historic Big Bethel AME Church on Auburn Avenue.

I am the architectural designer, urban planner, and graphic & web designer I am today because she believed in the blueprints of my imagination.

“The proposed White House ballroom is wholly incompatible with the site”

by Charles A Birnbaum

UPDATE: The National Capital Planning Commission has postponed its final vote on the White House East Wing Modernization Project to April 2, 2026, after receiving over 32,000 written comments and having more than 100 people registered to testify during the public hearing on March 5, 2026.

Opposition to Donald Trump’s White House expansion plans has focused on the building itself but the implications for the grounds are just as egregious, writes Charles A Birnbaum.


The debate about the proposed White House ballroom has prompted questions about stewardship of the nation’s most important cultural patrimony. But it also illustrates how landscape architecture has been ignored, and how principled regulatory processes have been twisted into a performative auto-da-fé.

On October 15, 2025, as reported in The New York Times, president Donald Trump told a group of supporters: “We started with a much smaller building, and then I realized, we have the land”.

Laws and guidelines regarding the grounds are being flouted and ignored

The “land” to which the president refers is the White House Grounds, a site that ranks among the nation’s most historically significant designed landscapes. It is also listed both in the National Register of Historic Places and as a National Historic Landmark (NHL).

However, laws and guidelines regarding the grounds are being flouted and ignored, and regulatory agencies are being stacked with loyalists who have demonstrated little interest, if any, in understanding the significance of the cherished and beloved landmark they’re affecting.

For more than a century, one of the greatest influences on the White House Grounds has been the landscape architect Frederick Law Olmsted Jr (son of the designer of US Capitol Grounds and New York City’s Central Park). He was the key contributing author to the 1916 Organic Act, which created the National Park Service (NPS), the federal agency that oversees the grounds.

In the act, Olmsted wrote the so-called “non-impairment” standard, where the NPS must “conserve the scenery and the natural and historic objects and the wildlife therein, and… leave them unimpaired for the enjoyment of future generations.” The Organic Act is the foundation upon which nearly all NPS management decisions are based.

In addition, since 1935, the stewardship and preservation of the iconic White House Grounds has been guided by the “Report to the President of the United States on the Improvements and Policy of Maintenance for the Executive Mansion Grounds”. This, too, was prepared by Olmsted Jr.

The report’s opening paragraph is both contextualizing and cautionary: “The White House Grounds… are characterized by many long-established landscape qualities of great dignity and appropriateness. It is of the utmost importance to perpetuate these qualities; and, in so far as they are affected by changes which are necessary or desirable for other reasons, to strengthen and perfect them instead of obscuring or weakening them.”

Landscape provides the essential overarching structure for the building

Olmsted noted that good management necessitates “a thorough study of the landscape history of the grounds,” and, as observed in the 2020 historical study The Olmsteds and The National Park Service, he specifically cited “the need for planning in advance of building expansion”.

Neither seems to be a priority at present.

There is one more important level of context. Since NPS is part of the Department of the Interior (DOI), the Secretary of the Interior is responsible for establishing professional standards and providing advice on the preservation of cultural resources listed in the National Register of Historic Places; that includes the White House Grounds.

Those standards can be found in the Secretary of the Interior’s “Guidelines for the Treatment of Cultural Landscapes”. They were created following an important policy shift at DOI from a “building” focus to one that was more holistic at a “property” scale. Yet, these guidelines have been largely ignored.

Importantly, the primary concern in addressing a historically significant cultural landscape is not solely its materiality, which is the focus when dealing with historic building architecture. It is first and foremost the property’s visual and spatial organization and relationships.

At the property scale, the landscape not only serves as the stage, but it also provides the essential overarching structure for the building contained therein, like the placement of walls or windows of a structure.

Current discussions about the ballroom project are almost exclusively architecture- and artifact-focused

As the author of the above-mentioned “guidelines” during my 15-year tenure as coordinator of the Historic Landscape Initiative at NPS from 1992 to 2007, it is my observation that the proposed ballroom, in its current iteration, is wholly incompatible with the site, and fundamentally violative of the Organic Act of 1916 and the Olmsted Plan of 1935, which have guided decision-making for decades.

Unfortunately, current discussions about the ballroom project are almost exclusively architecture- and artifact-focused.

Some members of Congress have raised policy and procedural concerns. In an October 24 2025 letter, representative Mike Turner, founder and co-chair of the Congressional Historic Preservation Caucus, asked “what efforts were undertaken by the… White House to identify, document and preserve historically significant artifacts, fixtures, or architectural components in the East Wing prior to demolition?”

And an October 30 2025 letter signed by 60 members cites the White House Preservation Act of 1961, which “requires the preservation of any ‘historic’ or ‘artistic’ property, including furniture, fixtures, and decorative objects, for the American public”.

Neither the letters nor the White House Preservation Act address the significant NHL-designated landscape, its historic visual and spatial attributes, “witness trees”, et cetera.

The two reviewing agencies, the US Commission of Fine Arts (CFA) and the National Capital Planning Commission (NCPC) are now stacked with loyalists. They are largely bereft of the knowledge, expertise, and leadership needed to make consequential and informed decisions about the White House Grounds.

This administration has shown that it will do as it pleases

The CFA unanimously approved the project on 19 February, despite receiving a record number of public comments (some 2,000), more than 99 per cent of which were opposed, and the NCPC is expected to follow suit on 5 March, despite polling that shows the public objects to the project by a margin of two to one and tens of thousands of comments.

Fortunately, the congressionally chartered National Trust for Historic Preservation, a private non-profit, filed suit on 12 December 2025 to halt construction. On 26 February, judge Richard Leon ruled against the trust on procedural grounds, but he noted that if the trust “is inclined to amend its complaint”, which the trust has announced plans to do, “the court will expeditiously consider it and, if viable, address the merits of the novel and weighty issues presented”.

Even if the court rules in the trust’s favor, further appeals are expected. What will happen in the interim? This administration has shown that it will do as it pleases – the law and public opinion be damned.

Charles A Birnbaum is the founding president and CEO of The Cultural Landscape Foundation, a Washington, DC-based education and advocacy non-profit which awards the Cornelia Hahn Oberlander International Landscape Architecture Prize.

The photo is courtesy of the US National Archives.